一對波鞋四圍走 Rendezmoi

2025年11月25日星期二

[Technology] How popular is Gemini 3?

Gemini 3 is currently very popular, with significant user engagement and performance metrics. It has 2 billion monthly users for and 650 million users for the . has topped the leaderboard, showcasing its advanced capabilities. The model is integrated into Google Search and developer tools, indicating widespread adoption and usage. It has been recognized as Google's most intelligent model, with improvements in reasoning and multimodal understanding. Overall, Gemini 3 is positioned as a leading AI model, reflecting its growing popularity and effectiveness in various applications.

Individual Comments on Gemini 3

‘Holy shit’: Gemini 3 is winning the AI race — for now | The Verge

Marc Benioff (Salesforce CEO):

After years of daily ChatGPT use, he said Gemini 3 was a game‑changer: “Holy shit … I’m not going back. The leap is insane — reasoning, speed, images, video… everything is sharper and faster.”

His endorsement signals a dramatic shift in enterprise perception.

Wei‑Lin Chiang (CTO, LMArena):

Gemini 3 Pro holds a “clear lead” in coding, math, and creative writing.

Surpasses and in agentic coding and visual comprehension.

Alex Conway (DataRobot engineer):

Highlighted Gemini’s performance on , scoring nearly twice as high as GPT‑5 Pro at one‑tenth the cost.

Also doubled GPT‑5.1’s score on , making it strong for niche knowledge.

Tim Dettmers (Carnegie Mellon):

Called it a “great model” but noted UX issues: doesn’t always follow instructions precisely.

Joel Hron (CTO, Thomson Reuters):

Found Gemini 3 strong in legal/tax reasoning tasks, outperforming Gemini 2.5 and some Anthropic/OpenAI models.

Louis Blankemeier (CEO, Cognita):

Excited by numbers but cautious: Gemini struggled with subtle radiology cases (rib fractures, rare conditions).

Compared radiology challenges to self‑driving cars — edge cases remain tough.

Matt Hoffman (Head of AI, Longeye):

Praised Gemini’s image generator for synthetic datasets but said benchmarks don’t map neatly to law enforcement use cases.

Thomas Schlegel (VP Engineering, Built):

Sees Gemini 3 as “everything we love about Gemini on steroids”.

Still plans to use a mix of models (Claude for coding, OpenAI for business reasoning).

Tanmai Gopal (CEO, PromptQL):

Acknowledged Gemini’s leap but said it’s “not the end of anything” for competitors.

Prefers Claude for code, ChatGPT for search, GPT‑5 Pro for brainstorming, but may adopt Gemini for consumer tasks.

Andrej Karpathy (AI researcher):

Positive early impression: “” with strong personality, humor, and vibe coding.

Noted quirks like refusing to accept the year 2025 or forgetting to turn on Google Search.

Reference

Google Releases Gemini 3: AI Powers Every Search Now - Technology Org

Gemini 3 is a game changer for Google - Fast Company

Google’s Gemini 3 is here — and it’s already beating ChatGPT in key benchmarks | Tom's Guide

Gemini 3: Introducing the latest Gemini AI model from Google

[Stock Market] Google’s AI Power Play: Meta Eyes Chips as Salesforce CEO Hails Gemini

Salesforce CEO Marc publicly praised , saying it has leapfrogged . He emphasized this shift as significant since he had relied on ChatGPT daily for years. His reaction (“Holy s**t”) highlights the surprise and weight of his endorsement. Benioff’s opinion carries influence because he is a prominent and outspoken tech leader. He has described AI as the most important technology of his lifetime, so his endorsement signals a major shift in enterprise attention toward Gemini.

Google and Meta are currently in discussions regarding a multi-billion-dollar deal involving . This deal could significantly reshape the competitive landscape in the AI chip market, with Meta considering both renting and purchasing Google's Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) starting in 2027. The agreement aims to enhance Meta's AI infrastructure and could potentially allow Google to capture a substantial portion of Nvidia's revenue, which is currently a major player in the market.

Reference

Google In Talks To Offer Its AI Chips To Meta; Nvidia, AMD Fall

Salesforce CEO sends surprising message on Google's Gemini model

2025年11月23日星期日

[Space] About 3I/ATLAS' Mass Loss of 5 Billion Tons a Month

An article has reported that Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb suggested comet 3I/ATLAS is losing about 5 billion tons of mass per month, possibly due to “technological thrusters pointing toward the Sun.” NASA quickly countered, stating it is a natural interstellar comet. The debate has sparked scientific and public controversy, with NASA confirming the comet shows non‑gravitational acceleration but attributing it to natural cometary processes/

NASA Reports 3I/ATLAS Mass Loss of 5 Billion Tons a Month – Suggests Possible Artificial Propulsion

Background of 3I/ATLAS

Discovery: 3I/ATLAS was first detected in July 2025 by the in .

Nature: It is the third confirmed interstellar object to enter our solar system, after ʻOumuamua (2017) and 2I/Borisov (2019).

Trajectory: Its orbit is hyperbolic, meaning it is not bound to the Sun and will eventually leave the solar system.

Speed: At perihelion (closest approach to the Sun), it reached speeds of 153,000 mph (68 km/s).

Scientific Value: Offers a rare chance to study material formed around another star system ~7 billion years ago.

Images: NASA and international observatories have released multiple images showing its coma and tail, confirming cometary behavior.

Detailed background on Wikipedia.

Observations & Speculation About “Spaceship” Theories

While mainstream science identifies 3I/ATLAS as a comet, some unusual features have fueled speculation:

Avi Loeb’s Claim: Suggested its mass loss and trajectory could be consistent with artificial propulsion.

NASA’s Response: Officials firmly reject alien spacecraft theories, stating “it looks and behaves like a comet”.

Public Speculation: Online discussions compared it to ʻOumuamua, with some conspiracy theories suggesting it might be a probe.

Scientific Debate: Physicist Michio Kaku dismissed the alien hypothesis, calling it a “cosmic relic” rather than engineered technology.

Unusual Tail: Observations show a complex, changing tail structure, which some enthusiasts interpret as evidence of artificiality, though astronomers attribute it to natural outgassing.

Academic Papers: A few speculative studies (e.g., Loeb et al. draft, arXiv preprint) explore the possibility of technological origins, but these remain fringe ideas.

3i/ATLAS Updates, 11/23/2025 by Beyond Orbit: